Gamblers Caveat
Making Dr. Nye A List
This person is not an MD. It’s bad enough that many MD’s do not believe the legitimacy of a patients chronic illness…. That’s been going on forever. Are these denialist doctors now following the lead of a non MD disease denialist pharma exec?
That’s cray cray but probably worth every bit of $385 million to the right person.
If you just subscribe to superstition instead of science then you can ignore a retrovirus and the known effects of retroviral infection. You can pretend as if chronic illness due to retroviral infection isn’t a thing if you’re not an MD, but a superstitious pharma exec who doesn’t even think viruses are real!
Watch out you might end up getting your pants sued off by concerned patient advocacy groups especially after they find out that you're sitting on a modest unearned fortune while giving out fallacious medical advice.
But is he really? Let’s look…
OK stop 🛑 🛑 🛑 🛑
Let's just slow down Dr. Nye. A list; of ontological orientation is demanded by the allegedly non existent patient community prior to proceeding.
“If you are out of balance…”
Well how am I going to know that Dr. Nye? A list; of imbalance characteristics is in order is it not? Or did you mean to infer something unquantifiable? Is this how we ‘science’?
We don't measure anymore?
What is it called when we talk without recourse about immeasurable things?
Is that science?
Or is that something else?
D.Nye.A.List….
Would help us here yes?
Well I don’t see ‘science’ anywhere here D.Nye,A list of the scientific aspects of imbalance is what I was seeking. Will you leave me here in ignorance? How cruel! You and your grandiloquence have driven me to fall back on my own education just to decipher whatever the hell it is that you are rambling about!
In the world of the real, in the world of the quantifiable, in regard to health in general and health science in particular the phrase ‘balance’ is the short hand annotation (you know Dr.s and their scribbles) which refers to the particular science of nutritional balancing. This must have been what he was referring to.
. . . [W]e cannot study human chronic inflammatory disease without understanding that viruses we have not yet identified may play a role in many human disease processes. To do so would be like going to the rainforest, studying only 2% of the animals, and coming to conclusions about how the entire rainforest functions off that information alone.
Despite this fact many doctors have been taught to test for only 10-20 well-known viruses in their human patients. If these viruses are not identified in the patient, it is assumed that a virus (or group of viruses) cannot be driving or contributing to the patient’s disease. We must work hard to change this assumption, because it greatly prevents the medical/research communities from looking at a much broader picture of what might be going on.
https://mineralsformigraines.com/herpes-viruses-migraine/
Thanks for that doc.
Continuing: “because of any one or handful myriad factors…”
🛑 🛑 🛑
Mu…myr…. What???
A handful of ten thousand we could take to mean fifty thousand. Does science not actually care if illness is caused by one factor or caused by fifty thousand factors?
Which is it?
Doesn't it matter? D.Nye.A list; of potential causative factors is what is in order here:
What could it be? What could be one or fifty thousand factors that might cause disease? Science wants to know dude. I think what he is saying is….
“Then the droning cadence of regular repetition begins again…
“Fact=Fact! No one has EVER seen Fact≠Fact! Fact=Truth! Drone, drone, drone.”
Then they pretend for a few days that there is some sort of enrichment process going on.
“Electricity”
they will cry with their heads high and noses up. “Electricity! Electricity!”
And they'll all look away from me while saying and pretend I'm not there.
“Electricity!…
and…. POISON!”
Oh? What's that?
“You know, STUFF! Little STUFF! In there! It's real bad that stuff!”
What is it?
“It's just bad stuff! Plus electricity! It could be anything!
That's a fact Jack!”
Got it!
Continuing:
“…your body responds by going through a recycle or reset to re establish your healthy internal equilibrium.”
Does science not distinguish between ‘recycle’ and ‘reset’?
D.Nye, A list of what is recycle and A list of what is reset would serve us well here.
Alas, the grunt work of interpreting a Dr.’s scribbles…. Do pity those nurses!
I think what he is saying here is that, in certain situations, recycle can be considered synonymous with reset. For example in the current era we are all undergoing a reset, isn't that correct doc? Certain “doctors” are helping us to undergo this “reset”. In the current reset the word recycle has become a more pleasant euphemism for what used to be referred to as “Soylent Green”. Since eating people has become a major directive under the new doctor led global reset it is ok to use the word “recycle” and “reset” interchangeably, in the current era.
Whatever it takes your body will do it for you without you having to think about it and when it's all done you will have arrived back at
“…your healthy internal equilibrium.”
Here Dr.Nye is pointing us back to the science of mineral balancing (also known as nutritional balancing) because he is so concerned about quantification and measurement throughout this process of recycling.
Though he does not explicitly say this in his lecture, Dr. Nye has implied that you will have returned to the same metabolic balance which you experienced prior to the reset. Of course this is ambitious and…. It is theoretically plausible though as he clearly understands it would be verifiable through laboratory analysis if true and if untrue the disparity between the mineral profile of your hair prior to the reset will be shown to be different than the mineral profile of your hair after the reset. Since it is measurable and quantifiable it does not need to be ambiguous.
(Susie Civilian strikes again!)
When we translate this sentence from doctors note, chicken scratch shorthand into something comprehensible to the rest of the world what we end up with is this:
When you are out of balance [for reasons], your body will do something. Once your body is done doing this thing, you will have returned to balance. —-A.T.S. (translating D.Nye)
Then he follows it up with:
“That's the way, at high level, to understand your body's temporary illness.” D.N. (emphasis sloth)
Gamblers Caveat
The world has totally lost the plot. No one gives a flying fuck about anyone else's “temporary” illness. This point is constantly expressed by essentially everyone and it is the foundational principle behind Dr. Nye’s “teaching”. Point taken D.Nye,A list;
Of what constitutes “temporary” illness
Vs.
What constitutes “permanent” illness is what is most called for in this moment.
However….
What? It's not in the budget?
Oh I see, we are simply to assume that all illness is temporary right? This is your clever caveat?
Well, it's a gamble now isn't it?
When Judy Mikovits scientifically established that at least 67% of a group of ME/CFS patients had evidence of XMRV infection in their blood she simultaneously discovered that the general population also had evidence of XMRV in their blood at a rate of 4%. The rate of infection among the disease group was later confirmed by other scientists to be 86%.
To a gambler 96% is pretty good odds and it's even better than that because not nearly all of that 4% is actually sick.
You've got quite a racket there D.Nye,A list;
Of those only temporarily ill vs. a list of those permanently ill would be wildly overweighted towards the temporary side. Nearly always correct would be the response to your gamble.
Absolutely incorrect is my response. Unscientific, fallacious, dishonest.
The concept of permanent physiological shift is reprehensible to those who lack empathy and ride carelessly on God's grace. The concept is explained by science via the knowledge of retroviruses.
SARS-COV-2 is a retrovirus.
Retroviruses Pseudotyped with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein Efficiently Infect Cells Expressing Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2
https://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/jvi.78.19.10628-10635.2004